Home Blog Page 36

lenten journal: morning glories

Barely a week into my Lenten Journal and I am already missing days.

One of the reasons is good. A longtime friend came to town for a few days and I spent the evenings talking with him instead of writing. But he’s been gone a couple of days and my depression took over responsibility for my absence. These are heavy days for a number of reasons, work in particular, and I am doing what I can.

I am grateful for my interim pastorate in Westbrook for several reasons, but today I am grateful because it gets me back to writing since I have to have a sermon for tomorrow. None of the lectionary passages inspired me so I chose a passage from Luke between last week and next week that is not included in the lectionary cycle: the parables of the mustard seed and the yeast (Luke 13:18-21).

It ended up being a helpful journey for me.

_____________________________

One of the things I love to do is dig around in our vegetable garden. When I say “our,” I’m talking about the plot behind our house, which is adjacent to the church parking lot, where a group from First Church Guilford dig and plant and harvest in our communal garden, which is available for anyone who either wants to work or needs some of what we are growing. Last summer we shared close to three hundred pounds of vegetables with folks fr/om our community and local food banks. And we ate well ourselves. We also grow flowers in the middle of the vegetables not only because they are pretty but also because they are necessary to attract the pollinators that help keep the garden healthy because the garden is a lot like our lives: it is never about one plant; the health of everything depends on everything else. The garden is an incredible web of relationships–just like life.

Tom has been my gardening buddy for the last five summers. My standard line is I put things in the ground and hope for the best, but Tom actually knows what we are doing. I’ve learned a great deal from him over the years. One of the things I’ve learned is that creative is better than perfect. We have beds marked out and we think about where and what we plant from season to season, but it’s not pristine. If a volunteer tomato plant comes up in the middle of the green beans, we just stake it and let it grow. Three or four years ago, he carried around a little container of morning glory seeds and planted them here and there. Each summer since, more and more of them have shown up without us having to plant anything new. They are everywhere.

I thought about those morning glories as I pondered our passage for today.

Right before Jesus told these two parables, people were questioning both his method and his motives. He wasn’t playing by the rules. He didn’t pay attention to the things that good holy people should be doing. To return to my gardening example, they seemed more concerned that the beds were clean and weed free than they were about what was growing in them. Finally, Jesus said, when it comes to the way God works in the world, think of a mustard seed. It’s small, but it grows into something big that gives birds a place to land. Or think about yeast. It only takes a little to leaven “three measures” of flour. (By our measurements today, that would be over four hundred cups of flour. I’m not sure what the woman was baking.)

In both examples, something small has huge implications.

I can’t tell you how many sermons and commentaries on this passage that stayed right there: one small act of kindness (or one seemingly small insult) can make a huge difference. And that’s an important word to live by, but Jesus is never that straightforward in his parables, and he didn’t tell these two stories in response to someone saying the details didn’t matter. In fact, he was responding to people who were incredibly picky about the details. They didn’t think he should have healed a little girl because it was the sabbath and healing counted as working.

Which brings me back to the morning glories in our garden.

The mustard plant Jesus was talking about was as invasive as the morning glories. It didn’t stay in nice neat rows. It blew with the wind. It traveled with the birds who perched on it when it was grown. It persisted in the soil and showed up wherever it wanted to. Though it had some medicinal uses, it was not an essential plant to the people of Jesus’ time. As much as I love seeing the morning glories, I will confess that after three or four summers of their being in the garden they come up in lots of places where we don’t want them to be, and no matter how much we pull them up, they just keep coming.

Jesus’ use of yeast as an example of how the realm of God spreads in the world is the same kind of story. The woman in the story wasn’t tearing open a little package like we get at the grocery store. She had a little mess of fermentation that she added to the flour. The difference in this story is she meant to put the yeast in the flour, whereas no one was planting mustard.

But in the Hebrew scripture, yeast is a symbol of sin. That’s why at Passover Jewish people remove it from their houses and eat unleavened bread. Perhaps Jesus imagined the yeast affecting such a large amount of flour not because the woman ran a bakery or something, but because, once again, he was saying that the Spirit of God runs over, spills out, goes all over the place.

My first memory of the power of yeast happened when I was a boy. As I have told you, I grew up in Africa. My mother decided she was going to make hamburgers, but they didn’t sell hamburger buns in the grocery store in Lusaka, Zambia. So she decided she would make them. She found a recipe in one of her cookbooks and made the dough, but the detail she missed was how much the dough would rise. She made each bun the size she wanted them to be when they were finished cooking. Instead, she ended up with four really big hamburger buns–big enough that she was able to cut one of them into quarters to make the burgers for her, my dad, my brother, and me. What she thought would make four buns fed us for days, which was not something she was expecting.

But then, we are getting a good bit of practice living with the unexpected.

After two years of the pandemic and some hint that we may be coming out from under the worst of it, one of the unexpected things is that we have a lot of reasons to be despondent about the future of the church right now. And when I say we I am speaking about a much larger group than the folks in this room or the members of this congregation. As we look at the days ahead, congregations across this country are unsure of what is going to happen. Many are wondering if they will survive for much longer or wondering if they will recognize themselves in a year or two.

The difficult reality is we don’t know the answers to those questions.

What the parables offer us is hope—an uncomfortable hope, but still hope—and that is that God’s presence in the world will keep showing up like yeast and mustard and morning glories. That presence may not be in the places where we have always found it, and God may not show up in ways that are comfortable. It may mean some things that we value and love will have to run their course for us to see where God is leading us. That’s another way of saying death has to come before resurrection. Sometimes God’s presence will feel nourishing like fresh-baked bread, and sometimes it will feel challenging, like uninvited morning glories, but what these parables say is that the realm of God is coming up all over the place. And Jesus said it as though it was good news and hard news all at the same time.

After he told these parables, one of the disciples asked him how many people would be saved and Jesus told another parable about the wide road and the narrow gate and how few people would choose the narrow gate, as if to say that even though they were drawing big crowds only a few folks would be the ones to catch on to the way God was at work in the world. His analogy makes me think of Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s words:

Earth’s crammed with heaven, and every common bush afire with God. But only [those] who [see take] off [their] shoes; The rest sit round it and pluck blackberries.

God is at work in wonderful, imaginative, and subversive ways. We must choose if we will perceive God’s presence as invasive or invitational. We have to choose if we will be those who disrupt our world like mustard plants and yeast, whether we will be those willing to let the Spirit of God to catch us by surprise.

Maybe this is a better way to say it: let us choose to be morning glories. Amen.

Peace,
Milton

lenten journal: the grace of never mind

the grace of never mind

the oceans are rising
the sky is falling
I am careening through
an obstacle course
of obligations and
overdue whatevers
I have unread e-mail
unanswered notifications
unwashed laundry
and unmade recipes
everything’s important
and requires my attention
then there’s ukraine
and war and washington
have you seen today’s headline
I’m not sure I want to
but the guns and the walls
and injustice rolling down
I need to fill up the tank
and answer some texts
get ready for tomorrow
remember . . . something
it’s a lot to ask, I know, but
can we go for a walk?

Peace,
Milton

lenten journal: and now, the temptations

As I say in the opening paragraph of my sermon for the first Sunday in Lent, to preach about the temptations made me want to listen to the Temptations.

so, round and around and around we go
where the world’s headed, nobody knows
oh, great googa-looga, can’t you hear me talking to you
just a ball of confusion
oh yeah, that’s what the world is today

I’m not sure I cleared up much of the confusion, but here’s the sermon.

_______________________

One of the great things about working on a sermon about the temptations of Jesus is that just about any time I sat down to read or think about it, I had a sudden urge to listen to Motown music. The Temptations have played in my head all week: “My Girl,” “Ain’t Too Proud to Beg,” “Ball of Confusion,” and “Papa Was a Rolling Stone.” I had an image of Jesus in the wilderness with backup singers.

It’s not how it actually went down in the desert, but it was a fun trip for me.

Luke says, “Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan (from his baptism) and was led by the Spirit in the wilderness, where for forty days he was tempted by the devil.”

It’s an odd sequence of events: the Spirit led him into the desert to be tempted by the devil. The word “tempted” can also be translated as “put to the test” or “put through a trial.” That helps me because “tempted” sends my mind thinking about how much I think about getting an ice cream cone whenever I shop at Bishop’s Orchards, or how I can hear the Salt and Vinegar potato chips calling me when I’m in the supermarket.

Jesus has more at stake in this text than blowing his calories for the day.

We have talked several times about how often Jesus seems to be trying to get away from the crowds to pray. Perhaps that desire came from these days in the desert. On the heels of his baptism, he went off by himself to be with God and, in the process, he had to come to terms with himself.

The genius of the temptations is not that they offered Jesus a whole different life, or even a chance to run away from responsibility. What they offered was a different version of himself–a lesser version. Instead of one who would use his miracles to heal and to teach, he could use them for personal gain. Instead of speaking truth to power, he could ally with those in charge to gain power for himself. Instead of facing suffering, he could use his privilege to avoid it and be on easy street.

And the temptations were not a one-time occurrence. It was not as though Jesus never had to stare down these options again once he returned to town. We might stay the temptations stayed with him for the whole tour. The tests he faced in the wilderness were examples of what he faced almost every day: to use who he was and what he could do as a way to make his life more comfortable and powerful.

And, though we may not be able to make bread out of rocks, they are temptations we face as well because they are invitations to live as though life doesn’t cost us anything.

One of the shows I like to watch is Top Chef. It is a reality shows that brings young chefs from all over the country and they go through various cooking challenges to see who can come out on top. At the end of every episode, one chef is eliminated until only one is left standing. Each episode starts with a “Quickfire Challenge” that focuses on a particular skill or ingredient. The winner of that challenge gets immunity in the following “Elimination Challenge,” which usually involves preparing a larger dish.

It’s a big deal to have immunity, I’m sure. But here’s what I have noticed: the chef who has immunity rarely does well in the Elimination Challenge. Either they just kind of coast along or they decide to risk so much that they lose their sense of who they are. The chefs that shine are those who have something at stake.

We are truer to God and to ourselves when we live as though something is at stake.

Because something is at stake. The temptation to think otherwise is a lie.

After he came out of the wilderness, Jesus went to Nazareth, his hometown—another place where people had ideas about who he should be—and read these verses from Isaiah:

The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,
because he has anointed me
to bring good news to the poor.
God has sent me to proclaim release to the captives
and recovery of sight to the blind,
to let the oppressed go free,
to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favor.

By the time the service was over, they ran him out of town because he was not who they wanted him to be. Jesus went back to Galilee and, as the crowds gathered again and again, kept trying to get off by himself to pray.

He had to keep listening to the Spirit to remember who he was and what he was called to do.

I was talking with a friend this week because we are both facing challenges at work that are leaving us with some tough decisions. He quoted wisdom from another friend who said, “We either choose our losses or we lose our choices,” which resonates with Jesus’ words that we have to lose our lives to find them. When we are willing to risk beyond what feels safe or comfortable, we see things in ourselves and in our world that we did not see before. We create possibilities. One of the ways we plot the resurrection is by letting things die so something new can come to life.

That sounds simple and it’s not. To choose our losses is messy and painful and hopeful and scary. But it is also true and beautiful and hard. The forty days of Lent are symbolic of Jesus’ forty days in the wilderness. May these days define us as much as those days defined him. Amen.

Peace,
Milton

lenten journal: winter wonderland

winter wonderland

I think winter gets a bad rap
it gets blamed for the
days getting shorter

but that is autumn’s fault
every day of winter is
a little longer than the last

yes, it’s cold but I like the cold
it’s also chili and cornbread
build a fire bundle up

people ask if my depression
is worse in the winter
no spring is the hardest time

the equinox makes me edgy
somehow the daffodils seem
to knock me in the dirt

the weight of the world makes
resurrection hard to take
can I say that out loud

I’ll miss winter even though
I’m dying to plant vegetables
life is not explained by seasons

Peace,
Milton

lenten journal: I’m glad we’re friends

When I woke up this morning, I had notification of a text message a dear friend had sent while I was sleeping. She had written about my blog post from Ash Wednesday and she closed her note with these words:

Your words helped me. You have a wonderful heart and brain, even though I know they give you trouble sometimes. I’m glad we’re friends.

I wrote back to say how much her words meant and explained,

I have been reading about the ways in which both Isaac Newton and Albert Eistein’s revelations were fueled by their pathologies, if not mental illnesses. had Newton not been so wracked with anxiety, he might not have seen what he saw. What one biographer called Einstein’s “schizoid personality” fueled his sense of wonder. I don’t claim to live in their neighborhood, but it helps me look for the eyes my depression offers along with the weight of it all.

The reason I know about Newton and Einsten is I am in the middle of Angela Tilby’s book Soul: God, Self, and the New Cosmology.

As she lays out an historical overview of how our scientific understandings have developed, she points out that Isaac Newton was interested in history more than science and was fascinated by how he could use the Bible to make predictions. “To make sense of this,” she says, “we have to come to terms with the fact that the primary force of Newton’s life was an attempt, though science and religion, to relieve immense personal anxiety.” She later says,

Newton had ample cause to resent his mother who had abandoned him and his stepfather who had failed to replace the real father he had never known. [Newton’s birth father died when he was a boy.] If creativity has any relationship with childhood loss, then there were plenty of looses for the creative instinct to work on. Science, for Newton, was a spiritual exercise, a way of contemplation and meditation. (56)

And what we remember him for is his uncovering the binding force of the universe.

Albert Einstein’s biographer, Anthony Storr says,

Einstein really did provide a new model of the universe; and, in order to create this, he had to detach himself from the conventional point of view to an extent which is only possible for one who, early in his life, made “leaving out everything subjective” his supreme aim. Such detachment can only be achieved by a person with a predominately schizoid psycho-pathology.

Neither description is complete. Both men were more than the sum of their pathologies or the sum of their successes, or even the mix of both. And I don’t want to romanticize mental illness as happens sometimes when we make a connection between depression and creativity, for instance. Part of me wants to say our wounds offer us the chance to see more compassionately, and perhaps more creatively, but I think that implies some self-reflection and I have no idea how much either scientist was conscious of what was going on inside them.

Then again, I’m not always sure I understand what is going on inside of me. When I read their stories, what hits me is that neither one of them felt like they fit in. That realization takes me from their science to my days in the classroom.

In one year of tenth grade English, I had two students, Joe and Mark, who had grown up together. They sat together in class. Neither one was particularly popular. Joe was like a Labrador puppy of a boy. He came bouncing into class and almost literally bouncing off the walls. About a week into the school year, he pounced into the classroom and asked if he could stand on his head. I figured letting him get the energy out was better than trying to bottle it up, so I told him he could do it until the tardy bell rang, which he did. And then he stayed at his desk the rest of the class. Other days he would come in and ask, “Mr. B-C, can I tell a joke to the class?”

“Tell the joke in your head first and see if you really want me to hear it,” I would reply. I would watch as he told it to himself. Somedays he smiled and said, “Yeah–I can tell this one.” Other days, he smiled and said, “Probably shouldn’t.”

Mark lived with a deep depression that could turn sinister and attacking. Most days, he fumed quietly, but on others I might ask for his homework and he would swear at me. Joe, who sat next to him, would say, “That’s okay, Mr. B-C, I’ll help him.”

That was the only year either of them were in one of my classes. One afternoon during their senior year, I met them in the hall. They were both getting close to graduation. Joe had grown into himself a bit more, and Mark had as well. When I asked how he was doing, he told me therapy and meds had made a difference.

I pointed to Phil and said, “I think your friend here saved your life. He took good care of you.”

Mark nodded. “Yes,” he said. “I know.”

Joe grinned at his friend. I wanted to stand on my head.

That memory brought me full circle to the text from my friend this morning. In a world that is more than we can comprehend, sometimes even more than we can take, I’m grateful for these words:

I’m glad we’re friends.

Peace,
Milton

lenten journal: stardust

I was in fourth grade in Lusaka, Zambia when Ms. Reedy started reading A Wrinkle in Time to our class as a reward for getting our daily work done early. I had never heard anything like it. Not only did it make me a lifetime Madeleine L’Engle fan, but it let me live with the notion that I could grasp something about science and space that mattered, even though I wasn’t that much of a scientist. That book made me believe the universe is made of stories.

I was in ninth grade at Nairobi International School the first time I heard Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young sing,

we are stardust, we are golden, we are billion year old carbon,
and we got to get ourselves back to the garden.

It would be a number of years before I learned that Joni Mitchell was the one who wrote those words. It would be even longer before I began to understand there was more to what she was singing than just a flower child’s dream. She was talking quantum theology–or so it seems to me as a sixty-five year old in Guilford, Connecticut reading Race and the Cosmos by Barbara Howard and Soul: God, Self, and the New Cosmology by Angela Tilby. I feel like Ms. Reedy and Madeleine are close by.

Joni was telling the truth: we are stardust. We are created in the image of God, the One who named themselves the verb To Be, the Spirit (the foundational, sustaining energy in everything). And we’ve got to get ourselves back in touch with that wherever we are. Barbara Howard takes the music of the spheres a step further, pointing to the ways in which the myths of ancient cultures appear to already know what (Western) scientists are uncovering–that music and stories are at the heart of our hope:

One recent awareness of the hum of the earth and the vibrations of our own inner energy speak to the dynamism of a universe that is stranger than we imagine. In the realm of quantum mechanics, as particles dance in chaotic but harmonious patterns, one wonders how the elders kew that music, dance, and storytelling were intrinsic to an indivisible world of experience, relationships, and science. Science speaks of a universe that vibrates and hums with energy; religion speaks of a God who also weeps and sings. (109)

Over the last few springs and summers working in our communal church garden, I have learned about the host of conversations going on in the soil as living beings from bugs to beans, mushrooms and weeds, trees and tomatoes talk to each other, share nutrients, and create a vibrant web of relationship that can reach for miles. The string theory of quantum physics imagines that the fundamental building blocks of everything are tiny, vibrating, looped strings. Everything, whether you are talking about planets or puppies, humans or hammers or hippos. All of our lives go on in endless song. Dale Pond, who studies something called “sympathetic vibrating physics,” says,

Genesis records God as having said Light into Being but perhaps it would be more accurate to say God sang Light into being as the prelude to our cosmic dance. (109)

Howard finishes the thought by saying, “The cultures of the two-thirds world bring these concepts into harmony through ritual and myth.”

All of these things were humming in my head as I prepared for our Ash Wednesday ritual, the first in two years where we could actually share the ashes. The previous interim pastor had saved the palm fronds from last year, so this afternoon I turned them into ashes, with help from a couple of YouTube tutorials, since I had never done it before and it involved fire. As the smoke rose from the bowl of burning leaves, I thought about ancient fires. As I got out of the car at church, it was dark enough to see Orion climbing over the steeple as I walked in carrying my container of stardust. In my notebook, I had this poem from Jan Richardson:

So let us be marked
not for sorrow.
And let us be marked
not for shame.
Let us be marked
not for false humility
or for thinking
we are less
than we are

but for claiming
what God can do
within the dust,
within the dirt,
within the stuff
of which the world
is made,
and the stars that blaze
in our bones,
and the galaxies that spiral
inside the smudge
we bear.

After we had sung and prayed and I read the poem, I stood at the front and people lined up to come forward. We were all masked, but I could still dip my thumb in the dark mystery of the ashes and oil and mark their foreheads as I said,

“From stardust you came and to stardust you will return.”

I was smiling the whole time, even though no one could see.

Peace,
Milton

beyond tired

Luke’s account of the Transfiguration intersected life this week, thanks to the Revised Common Lectionary, and I found a strange solace in the story I had not seen before. Sometimes, I suppose, tired eyes see new things.

____________________________

Maybe it’s just me.

Or maybe it’s that we are marking the second anniversary of the full descent of the pandemic on our country. And just as we begin to get some hint that things might ease up on the COVID front, we’ve watched Vladimir Putin invade Ukraine and listened as the governor of Texas told people to start reporting parents of trans children as child abusers. That’s just part of the news this week—and we haven’t even touched on any personal issues.

Maybe all those things are what lead me to see how exhausted Jesus and his disciples appear to be most every time we come to read our Sunday scripture. They are living in their own whirlwind of people wanting to hear Jesus, people wanting Jesus to heal them, Jesus trying to teach his disciples while those who disagree with him politically and theologically keep trying to trip him up and the Romans keep working to kill him.

In fact, it’s that last thing that sends them up the mountain. The disciples returned from trips to other towns and Jesus started talking about dying—well, being killed. After that, Luke says, Jesus took Peter, James, and John up the mountain to pray. As I said, they were exhausted even before the hike. Once they got to the top, Jesus started to pray and the disciples fell asleep.

But then something woke them up.

Jesus’ face was luminous and he looked like he was dressed in lightning. Moses and Elijah were with him and they, too, were talking about his death—his departure—which, Luke says, he “was about to accomplish” in Jerusalem.

Peter and the others were still groggy, but they made themselves wake up to see what was happening. Peter, true to form, spoke up even though he had no idea of what he was saying. “This is great!” he said and, in his confusion, shifted into hospitality mode. “Maybe we should pitch tents for each of you.” Nobody else said a word. And then a cloud enveloped the mountaintop and God was in the cloud and said, “This is my Chosen One. Listen to him!” And then the cloud, the voice, the two prophets, and the lightning all disappeared and they were alone on the mountain.

When they came back down, they kept silent. Even Peter.

Maybe they kept quiet because they didn’t know how to describe what had happened. Or maybe they didn’t say anything because they didn’t have a chance. Once they got back to the bottom of the hill, the crowds descended on them. The other disciples were in a panic because they felt overwhelmed. Nobody seemed to care what had happened on the mountain. They wanted to talk about their stuff.

Life went on, as exhausting as ever.

Over the years, I have heard sermons on this passage that talked about the power of “mountaintop experiences,” those moments when God feels especially close and life transcendent. Those sermons made it sound as though Peter didn’t want to leave: “let’s build shelters for everyone and stay here.” Then the preachers went on to say that we had to learn to live in the valley of life because that’s where things grow. We can’t survive in perpetual transcendence.

That’s a lesson worth pondering, but I wonder about another angle.

The details we are given make it look as though the time on the mountain wasn’t exceedingly joyful or euphoric for the disciples. They woke from a dead sleep to find Jesus talking with Moses and Elijah about his death, then a cloud rolled in and a voice told them to listen to Jesus, and then they came back down the hill. They weren’t any less exhausted or any more confident than when they started climbing. They didn’t know what had happened. The best they could do was not talk about it. And yet, here we are twenty-one centuries later, reading the story, which means at some point they did figure out how to talk about it.

The fact that we have the gospel accounts means that they did tell others what they saw and heard that day, but it was after they had taken time to remember what had happened. They didn’t talk about their immediate reactions; they kept quiet and let it sink in. Also, when they came back to town, they walked into the middle of crowds and soldiers and, well, life.

My guess is some time after Jesus’ death and resurrection, as they began to try and figure out how to live without him, they thought back on their experiences with him. Maybe Peter, James, and John talked between themselves about what they saw and heard that day and then said to the others, “Remember the time we went up the mountain with Jesus and we came down dazed and nonverbal? Well, let us tell you what happened.” Then they were able to begin to see what it meant to them beyond the clouds and lightning and exhaustion.

And even then, what they saw and heard wasn’t easily explainable. Even this morning as we have read the story, we have not explained it; we have only brushed up against the lightning.

As I was reading this morning, I came across a sentence that said we are often tempted to try and “reduce the awesomeness of life to manageable proportions.” Perhaps what was at the heart of their silence was they didn’t want an explanation. They wanted to live in the awesome mystery of the moment.

That’s the invitation this morning, four days before Lent begins and two years into the pandemic that feels like it will never end: it’s going to be a while before we know what the living of these days means for us—but we can begin to learn from them if we will keep quiet and listen, and maybe look a little farther back to stories we have forgotten to keep telling.

One of the reasons that is hard to do is that we live in a culture addicted to the immediate. Most of the opinions voiced on television or written in the newspaper are about what happened today, not what happened last month or last year or the year before that—and they are happy to provide concise, repeatable explanations for everything.

But we rarely learn from things as they are happening to us. And simple explanations do not leave room for the awesomeness of our unexplainable universe. We need time to be silent, to reflect, to remember the stories, and to retell them so different details can rise and fall and open our hearts to greater compassion and understanding.

As we look ahead to life beyond the worst of the pandemic, for instance, perhaps we would do well to remember—to put together again—what life was like before words like COVID and omicron became so familiar. I’m not talking about being nostalgic, or simply wishing the pandemic hadn’t interrupted everything. What about those days is worth remembering? What moments were clothed in lightning or clouds? What exhausted us? Where was God for us in those days? What from that time has sustained us?

What stories are worth telling again?

In the days and months to come, some of those things may come back. Chances are some may not. Life is not going to go back to the way it was any more than it did for Peter and James and John after they saw Jesus blinged out in his lightning and talking with Moses. The days to come may also continue to be as exhausting as the ones we are living. And, just like Jesus, we are all going to die.

One of my favorite prophets, Mavis Staples, sings, “Death is slow, but death is sure,” and then she says, “Allelu, allelu”—that’s the gospel truth: death is sure, and so is love. Alleluia. We can be tired and tenacious, exhausted and encouraged, perplexed and amazed. Death is not that last word, love is—that is the story we keep telling—and learning from—over and over, even though we can’t explain it. Amen.

Peace,
Milton

love your unfriends

Part of my sermon preparation this past week was spent digging into my etymological dictionary because I like to know where words come from. I found out the Latin word from which we get our word “enemy” translates literally as “an unfriend.” That new understanding shaped how I looked at Jesus’ familiar admonition to love our enemies from Luke 6. A few days later, I read Pádraig Ó Tuama’s newsletter that made the same observation as he introduced the latest episode of On Being—just one of the things I want to talk about with him when I finally get to sit down with him over dinner or beers or something.

Here’s the sermon for this week.

___________________________________________

Love your enemies.

Those words loom so large that they are almost hard to take seriously.

I started by trying to think of those whom I would consider enemies. As a lifelong Red Sox fan, I suppose one answer is obvious, but it feels almost too easy, and I guess I would say I don’t really hate the Yankees I just hope they lose. Every time.

My next question was to think about who the enemies were for the people Jesus was speaking to, and in that case the Romans would have been the ones in pinstripes. They were the oppressors, the occupiers, the ones standing on the necks of the Jewish people. When Jesus said if you got hit in the face, turn the other cheek, his example was not totally metaphorical, I’m guessing. He was standing in a field surrounded by a crowd of people who had gathered because of what he said and what he did—and I don’t imagine it was a quiet crowd. I’m sure the Roman authorities had it well policed. Jesus might have even been able to see some of the soldiers as he spoke.

Often, violence gives birth to violence. Part of the strategy of oppression is to divide those you wish to conquer. As the years passed, there were significant political and theological divisions among the Jewish people that created enemies as well. And Jesus was talking to a whole bunch of people who lived in small towns where they had histories that had also created hurts and difficult memories creating enemies with a lowercase letter rather than a capital E.

Our word enemy comes from a Latin word that literally means “an unfriend.” I smiled when I read that because, thanks to Facebook, we first learned to “friend” people—to let them in our circle—and then to “un-friend” them when it was necessary. But the Latin word is a noun, not a poorly-created verb; an enemy is an unfriend—someone who unloves you, and you them.

What makes someone our enemy?

Jesus started the list when he said, “Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you.”

Some other translations add greater nuance: Value your enemies as people created in the image of God, act honorably towards those detest you, bless those who say bad things about you, pray for those who threaten you.

That translations differ between those who abuse you and those who threaten you call me to an important point before I continue. Jesus was not saying people who are in abusive relationships should stay there and “love their enemies.” If you or someone you know are in a situation where they are physically or emotionally or sexually abused, you are not called by God to stay there.

As I read Jesus’ words, I started my own list: oppression, perceived difference, perceived threats to our comfort or our worldview, disagreement, insecurity, fear, ignorance.

As I have told you, I grew up in Africa. The first time I remember being in America, I was five years old. My father was preaching at a church and I was walking with him outside of the building when one of the deacons stopped him and said, “You’re crazy as hell for going to Africa and preaching to those n—–s.”

My father was caught off-guard and said, “What?” and the man repeated what he had said. Then my dad told me later that I looked up at the man and said, “Mister, do you know any of them?” (Even in my childlike innocence, I had already learned that the world divided into Us and Them.)

The man was then caught off-guard and said, “What?” to me.

“Do you know any Africans?”

“Of course not,” he said.

My father said I smiled and replied, “That’s too bad. They’re really nice.”

The man looked at me and then at my father and said, “Your kid is crazy as hell, too.”

The lesson that felt natural to me as a little kid, and that I have had to relearn over and over, is that we have to humanize people if we are going to love them. There is no Them; there is only Us. When we allow ourselves to label others as Them, for whatever reason, we are creating unfriends. If we can dismiss someone, or a group of people, with a label we are creating unfriends. To begin to learn how to love our enemies is to allow them to be more than the caricatures we have allowed ourselves to hold. Remember, Jesus didn’t say, “Get your enemies to love you.” He was talking about how we open our hearts, how we grow more fully into the image of God that we are. We have to think about new ways to talk to and about them if we are going to change how we feel about them, which is another way of remembering that love is a creative act. To love someone—particularly someone we have not chosen to love before—creates new possibilities. We could even go so far as to say it redefines the universe.

So I will: when we love your enemies, we redefine the universe.

Just as God, who is Love, spoke the universe into being, so we create a new universe of possibility when we speak (and act in) love where there has been none; we create hope beyond the hurt and fear and damage and ignorance that divides us.

At the end of our passage, Jesus says something that is most often translated as “the measure you give is the measure you’ll get back,” that makes him sound like the Beatles: “And in the end the love you make is equal to the love you take.” But Jesus actually uses the same word three times, so that it reads, “For by the measure you use to measure, it will be measured in return to you.”

Jesus started with, “Love your enemies,” moved to, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” and then went down a list of several different ways of saying, “Don’t respond to violence with violence if you want to be a catalyst of love in the lives of those around you,” which makes me wonder if we might not hear that last verse this way:

“Remember the way you measure and size up those around you is the way you are going to get sized up as well.”

If we want to go through life acting like a bad piano teacher who seems to relish telling everyone what they have done wrong, then we will be judged by our mistakes and shortcomings. If we don’t have kind words to say to others, we should not expect to receive any–even more, we should not expect that people will think we are kind. If we respond to those we deem as our enemies with violence and vitriol because that is what they throw at us, why would we expect that they would think we are any different than them?

But if we value our enemies—those we think of as Them—as people created in the image of God, act honorably towards those who detest us, bless those who say bad things about us, and pray for those who threaten us, we will be measured by our kindess and grace. Like the old song says, they will know we are Christians by our love.

Still, I think it would have helped if he had said, “Try to value your enemies as people created in the image of God,” because love like this doesn’t just happen. It has to be practiced day after day.

In my twenties, my parents and I became unfriends to one another. It’s hard to say we were enemies, but we struggled to have a relationship. We all felt hurt and we hurt each other in our words and actions. I married Ginger in my early thirties. The divide with my parents deepened. One day in my late thirties, Ginger said, “I have an idea. We are never going to get to have the big talk that clears everything up between us and your parents. So why don’t we let that go and just start from scratch. Pick a day of the week, call them, and do these things: Say hello; how are you? What did you do this week? Here’s what I did this week; I love you; Goodbye.

I started calling every Saturday morning. I didn’t explain what I was doing, I just called and went down my list. It was awkward at first, but then it became part of my week. Of our week. And then it grew into longer calls and then calls when it wasn’t Saturday. We learned how to humanize one another. To love one another. But here’s what I mean when I say we have to practice loving. It took four or five years of Saturday calls to break down the barriers we had built over many, many years.

Love your enemies. Try to love your enemies. Take it a day at a time.
Let love be the measure of your life. It is the measure that matters most. Amen.

Peace,
Milton

caught by surprise

Over the past week or so my depression has made a presence of itself—life feels increasingly heavy and deflated. I can point to some circumstances that are contributors, but one of the difficult things about living with depression is it doesn’t require a cause to make itself known.

The lectionary passage for this week is part of a sermon where Jesus says those who are mourning are blessed because they can look forward to laughter, and that those who don’t know grief have got some hard days coming.

Well, the hard days are here. Here’s what felt worth saying today.

_________________________________

I’ve been reading a book called The Geometry of Grief by Michael Frame and he made the statement that beauty and grief were next door neighbors: they are not identical, but they live on the same street. He says that what makes something beautiful is the combination of it being familiar and a novelty at the same time—you think you know what you are going to see and it catches you by surprise. Grief, he says, is much the same—you think you know how life is going to go and then you are caught by an irretrievable loss. Moments of deep joy and deep sadness come from the same place.

I wonder if Jesus had something similar in mind as he made his parallel lists in the verses we read this morning.

As I read over the passage it struck me that Jesus had to work hard to get any time to himself—right from the start of his ministry. There are forty verses between the passage we read last week about Jesus calling Peter, James, and John to follow him and the verses we are looking at today. In those short words there are at least two healing miracles, a couple of theological discussions with those who didn’t feel like Jesus was doing it right, a party at Matthew’s house after he was called to be a disciple, and an attempt to get away to pray. When he came back into town, the crowd was waiting. They were clamoring to get close to him to get what they needed.

Rather than getting frustrated at everyone jostling for position, he began to talk to them about four things: poverty, hunger, grief, and social standing. He went down the list twice. The first time he talked about feeling blessed; the second time he talked about feeling miserable.

–how blessed are you who are poor because the realm of God is yours;
–how blessed are you who are hungry now because you are going to have enough to eat;
–how blessed are you who are weeping now because you are going to laugh;
–how blessed are you when you are marginalized because those divisions don’t matter to God.

Then he said

–how miserable for you to be rich because you are trapped in your comfort;
–how miserable to have all you want to eat because you are going to end up hungry;
–how miserable for you who don’t feel loss because sorrow will find you;
–how miserable for you when everyone says nice things about you because you can’t live on flattery.

It feels like Jesus is choosing sides–making a list of who’s in and who’s out in God’s eyes—but if we go back to the idea of grief and beauty living on the same street, we can see more to the story.

Generally, when we read the gospels we are left to imagine Jesus’ tone of voice. I could tell that some of the commentators I read this week thought Jesus was scolding the crowd, but others imagined that he was describing what it was like for the two groups of people. As I read and re-read the passage, it struck me that Jesus wasn’t complimenting and cursing people as much as describing their reality. To say it another way, those who have been caught by surprise by poverty, hunger, grief, and marginalization have a chance to be on the receiving end of compassion and care, and thus are blessed to know how to help others in a way that humanizes both the giver and the receiver. Those who live in a place of excess and comfort find it hard to change for fear of losing what they have; they don’t want a surprise, only what is safe and familiar—and that won’t last.

I’ll give you a concrete example. After my father died, I felt grief I had never known. Ginger’s father had died a year and a half earlier. I said to her, “I feel like we could call everyone we know whose father died before mine and say, ‘We’re sorry. We meant well, but we had no idea this is what you were dealing with.” I remember my first day back at work. At that time, I worked as a trainer in an Apple Store. I felt paralyzed. I couldn’t concentrate. Everyone at work was kind, but I could tell they didn’t get it—and I understood that. One person whose father lived with a chronic illness that made death an inevitability hugged me and said, “I know how you feel. Let’s go get a cup of coffee.” We walked next door to the coffee shop, got our drinks, and sat silently for ten or fifteen minutes. And it helped.

On the other side, do you remember how many of us were driving around trying to find toilet paper and paper towels when the pandemic first hit two years ago? The impulse when we found some was to buy all we could so we didn’t run out. And that was the heart of the problem. The issue was not that there was not enough to go around. It was that people hoarded out of fear of running out or out of greed in hope of reselling it (and I’m sure there were other reasons). But if we had all continued to buy the paper products as we had done so before the pandemic—which is to say if we had thought beyond putting ourselves first—there would have been enough to go around.

It seems like a simple enough truth about life, doesn’t it? Yet it’s one we have to keep coming back to.

One of the recurring themes any time a messenger from God shows up in scripture is the first words they say are, “Don’t be afraid.” We tend to imagine the messengers started that way because the people weren’t used to having an angel in the room, but their words are more far-reaching. When folks were out snatching up toilet paper, they were driven by fear: what if there is not enough for me?

When we begin to accumulate things, we often begin to be afraid of losing them. The more we have, the more we have to take care of—and, often, the less we take care of each other. It’s not that those who live in poverty or who go hungry are not scared, but Jesus is saying they are not as controlled by their fear because they have to learn how to share and how to depend on one another.

Here’s a statistic to illustrate the point: the state of Mississippi is fiftieth in per capita income: the poorest state. It is also second in per capita charitable giving. Mississippians give 7.2% of their income away to various causes. Connecticut is sixth in per capita income; we are forty-fifth in charitable giving. We average sharing 3.2% of what we have.

I share those numbers not to induce guilt, but to ask what we are afraid of. Jesus looked at those around him who just made sure they were fed and safe and had more than they needed and said, “That must be miserable because you and I both know that won’t last.”

We are all exhausted. The pandemic has made frustration and fear far too familiar. It is difficult to see beyond where we are right now. As we hear Jesus’ words, let us remember that to take solace in our comforts will not silence our fears. To move beyond our fears so we can be surprised by joy means sharing what we have and asking for help. It means we are in this together. The way hungry people are fed is by someone else sharing their food. The way poor people survive is by others creating opportunity. The way grieving folks are comforted is by other grieving folks sharing their sorrow. The way those at the margins find a place to belong is by others widening the circle.

We are not defined by our circumstances, but by the way we respond to them. We can be miserable and trapped by our fear, or we can be open to the surprise of blessing. May we be people who choose the blessing. Amen.

Peace,
Milton

fish for sheep

In her essay “Soon This Space Will Be Too Small,” Jordan Kisner writes,

Even if we are not fated to circle a single story for our whole lives, perhaps we are obliged to follow a single thought all the way until we have finished it. Thoughts can take years.

This a weekend that retells the beginning of the story Ginger and I are telling in our lives together and the lectionary story of Jesus calling Simon, James, and John to drop everything and follow him. At the heart of both is the single thought I can not exhaust: we are loved; we are really, really loved.

_____________________________

There was an ice storm in Fort Worth, Texas this weekend.

I know that doesn’t matter much to folks here in New England, other than to feel sorry for them, but it was a sentimental moment for Ginger and me because thirty-three years ago on this very weekend we had our first date in Fort Worth, Texas—where we lived at the time—and there was an ice storm.

We met the weekend before on a youth retreat. She was a sponsor with one of the church groups and I was leading the music. Neither of us expected for the weekend to be life changing. And then we met each other, had our first date going to see Lyle Lovett in an ice storm, and the rest is history.

Whether we are talking about couples or long-time friends, the “how we met” stories are always worth telling.

Our scripture this morning reads like one of those stories, but the more times I read this story, the less I think this was Jesus’ first encounter with Peter, James, and John. The way Matthew and Mark tell the story, it reads like Jesus was walking through town picking up disciples like he was picking up groceries. For them to be willing to just get up and go makes me think they knew the day was coming. I don’t know another way to explain how Jesus could just walk up and say, “Follow me,” and the guys just walk away from work and family and everything else.

Luke takes a little more time to let the story unfold. Though Matthew and Mark say Jesus had begun preaching, Luke has him in the middle of a crowd when he encounters the fishermen. Almost every time there is a crowd in the gospel accounts, they are hungry—for words, for food, for hope. Jesus comes upon Simon and James and John who are washing their nets after a disappointing night at work. Their day is ending.

Jesus got in one of the boats, sat down, and asked them to push out a bit so he could talk to the crowd. Many years ago, Ginger and I went to Israel and Palestine and stood on the shores of the Sea of Galilee. Our guide told this story and remarked of Jesus’ understanding of acoustics: talking from the water to the shore made his voice louder. More people could hear him.

What Jesus asked of the men was inconvenient and imposing. They were cleaning up. They had to get back in the boat and take him out and then sit there while he preached. When he finished, he told them to row our further and drop their nets. Simon was less than hopeful, but said, “Because you asked, we’ll do it”—another clue that they were already acquainted.

And they caught so many fish that the nets began to tear and the boats began to sink and, based on Simon’s response, it all felt like a metaphor for how Simon felt about the whole thing: he dropped to his knees and said, “I am not worthy of this. Go away from me.”

Jesus’ response was, “Don’t be afraid. Now you are going to fish for people.”

Luke says they docked the boats, left everything, and followed Jesus. They didn’t walk away from their jobs in frustration after a fruitless night of fishing. They walked away from two boats loaded with fish. From a winning fish lottery ticket. But instead of the fish, they saw the mass of hungry people that Jesus saw as well.

I read a phrase this week that stuck with me: ordinary devotions, which means in our lives we may “undergo the same realizations, write the same notes in the margin, return to the same themes in one’s work, relearn the same emotional truths” because “such revisitations constitute a life.”

The thing Jesus kept coming back to with Simon (whom he also called Peter) and the others was that they were wonderfully and uniquely created in the image of God and worthy to be loved. We see that theme repeated over and over in the gospels. They appear to have bet their lives on being with Jesus, because when he was executed they were devastated. We observe the crucifixion already knowing about the resurrection; the disciples were not so fortunate. Peter followed Jesus as he was taken into custody and ended up in the courtyard outside the place where the trial was taking place. In the course of conversations around the fire, he denied knowing Jesus three different times.

After Jesus’ death and a couple of days of regret and remorse, Peter went back to what he had walked away from. “I’m going fishing,” he said. And they got in their boats and fished all night. I wonder if Peter made the connection. At dawn, someone called from the shore and told them to try again—and they caught so many fish that the nets almost broke and the boat almost sank.

And Peter said, “It’s the Lord,” jumped in the water and swam to shore.

I think that in that moment Peter not only recognized Jesus but he remembered the ordinary devotions Jesus had returned to over and over. Jesus believed in Peter more than Peter believed in himself. In their first encounter, Jesus had to get them to look up from their nets to hear what he had to say. They were so wrapped in the repetitive details of their days and the demands of their work that they had to be shocked into awareness of who was right in front of them. The boat full of fish helped them see that there was more to their lives than they had ever been able to see—and Jesus was offering to show them who they could become. The second time, they were wracked by despair and guilt and grief that they had to be astounded in order to remember that love is stronger than whatever we might have done.

At the end of the second encounter, Jesus asks Peter the same question three times—do you love me?—and then, when Peter says yes, Jesus says, “Feed my sheep.” Though he’s switching metaphors, I think he’s saying much the same thing as, “Fish for people,” and that is, “You know what it feels like to feel hopeless, or caught, or despairing, or guilty, or like nothing will ever be the same again, and now you know what it feels like to know you are wonderfully and uniquely created in the image of God and worthy to be loved. Go tell everyone you can what that feels like and tell them they are included.”

In other words, “Fish for sheep.”

Whoever you are and wherever you are on life’s journey—whether in the boat or on the shore, feeling on top of the world or at the bottom of the pile, wracked by guilt, buried by despair, clinging to hope, hoping for change, longing for normalcy, or just drowning in daily details—Christ’s invitation is still the same: come fish for sheep. This is the story we keep returning to so we can relearn that we are wonderfully and uniquely created in the image of God and worthy to be loved. This is the ordinary devotion worth repeating, the old story that has new things to say every time we tell it—and we need to tell as many people as you can. Amen.

Peace,
Milton